Skip to main content

Table 4 Sensitivity analyses on the association of sulfur microbial diet scores with the risk of esophageal cancer a

From: Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study in 101,752 American adults

Categories

No. of Participants

No. of Cases

Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) by Sulfur Microbial Diet Scores a

P for trend

Quartile 1 (≤ 18)

Quartile 2 (19–20)

Quartile 3 (21–22)

Quartile 4 (≥ 23)

Excluded participants with a family history of esophageal cancer b

98,281

147

1.00 (reference)

0.87 (0.52, 1.45)

1.31 (0.82, 2.10)

1.62 (1.03, 2.55)

0.020

Excluded participants who were in control group c

51,816

69

1.00 (reference)

1.53 (0.68, 3.42)

1.62 (0.73, 3.61)

2.59 (1.23, 5.45)

0.008

Excluded participants with extreme body mass index d

99,761

152

1.00 (reference)

0.92 (0.56, 1.52)

1.31 (0.82, 2.09)

1.62 (1.04, 2.55)

0.020

Excluded participants with extreme energy intake e

100,276

150

1.00 (reference)

0.88 (0.53, 1.47)

1.26 (0.79, 2.01)

1.60 (1.02, 2.51)

0.023

Excluded physical activity from covariates f

101,752

154

1.00 (reference)

0.90 (0.54, 1.48)

1.27 (0.80, 2.02)

1.61 (1.03, 2.50)

0.020

Excluded cases observed within the first 1 years of follow-up

101,740

142

1.00 (reference)

0.88 (0.52, 1.47)

1.23 (0.76, 1.98)

1.51 (0.95, 2.39)

0.052

  1. a HR were adjusted for age(years), sex (male, female), race (white, non-white), marital status (married or living as married, other), education level (college below, college graduate, postgraduate), smoking status (never, current, former), pack-years of smoking (continuous), body mass index (kg/m2), aspirin use (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes), history of hypertension (no, yes), energy intake from diet (kcal/day), physical activity (min/week), and intake of pickled vegetables/fruit(g/day)
  2. b HR was not adjusted for family history of esophageal cancer
  3. c HR was not adjusted for control group
  4. d HR was not adjusted for extreme BMI
  5. e HR was not adjusted for extreme energy intake
  6. f physical activity has a high missingness of more than 25%, which may have a significant impact on the results