Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between child ‘Oral’ and child ‘Social-Emotional’ sensory processing segments of the CSP2 and child appetitive traits at 9–11 years old (n = 130)

From: Sensory processing and child appetitive traits: findings from the ROLO longitudinal birth cohort study

 

Model 1

Model 2

 

B

95% CI

R2

p-value

 

B

95% CI

Adj R2

p-value

 
  

Lower

Upper

    

Lower

Upper

   

Oral sensory processing

Oral sensory processing (predictor)

            

Enjoyment of Food

-0.038

-0.053

-0.023

0.166

< 0.001

***

-0.038

-0.055

-0.022

0.203

< 0.001

***

Oral sensory processing (predictor)

            

Desire to Drink

0.043

0.027

0.058

0.186

< 0.001

***

0.044

0.025

0.062

0.145

< 0.001

***

Oral sensory processing (predictor)

            

Satiety Responsiveness

0.019

0.004

0.034

0.047

0.013

*

0.022

0.005

0.039

0.078

0.013

*

Oral sensory processing (predictor)

            

Food Fussiness

0.077

0.059

0.095

0.351

< 0.001

***

0.080

0.059

0.101

0.351

< 0.001

***

Social-Emotional responses associated with sensory processing

Social-emotional (predictor)

            

Food Responsiveness

0.020

0.006

0.034

0.059

0.005

*

0.018

0.002

0.034

0.126

0.026

 

Social-emotional (predictor)

            

Emotional Overeating

0.015

0.006

0.025

0.072

0.002

**

0.013

0.002

0.024

0.096

0.022

 

Social-emotional (predictor)

            

Desire to Drink

0.025

0.012

0.038

0.102

< 0.001

***

0.023

0.008

0.038

0.041

0.004

**

Social-emotional (predictor)

            

Emotional Undereating

0.015

0.004

0.027

0.049

0.011

*

0.018

0.004

0.031

0.035

0.011

*

Social-emotional (predictor)

            

Food Fussiness

0.027

0.010

0.044

0.070

0.002

***

0.029

0.009

0.049

0.060

0.004

**

  1. Model 1 Unadjusted linear regression. Model 2 Multiple linear regression adjusted for child age at 9–11-year follow-up, child sex, breastfeeding exposure, whether complimentary feeding was introduced as per timing recommendations or not, maternal education level and original RCT allocation group, Maternal BMI at 9–11-year follow-up, Child BMI at 9–11-year follow-up.
  2. The co-efficient for each CEBQ outcome is presented.
  3. Social-Emotional = Social- Emotional responses associated with sensory processing.
  4. CI Confidence Interval. B = Unstandardized coefficient.
  5. R2 = variance explained within the linear regression model. Adjusted R2 = variance explained within the multiple regression model.
  6. Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate adjustment applied. *Q = 0.05, **Q = 0.01, ***Q = 0.001