Skip to main content

Table 2 Weighted logistic regression analysis assessing the relationship between the DII and the risk of developing CKMS

From: Association between dietary inflammatory index and cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic syndrome risk: a cross-sectional study

Characteristic

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR (95% CI)

p

 

OR (95% CI)

p

 

OR (95% CI)

p

DII

1.14 (1.09,1.19)

< 0.0001***

1.16 (1.12,1.22)

< 0.0001***

1.12 (1.08,1.18)

< 0.001***

Q1

Reference

-

Reference

-

Reference

-

Q2

1.25 (1.00,1.55)

0.05

1.23 (0.98,1.54)

0.07

1.17 (0.93,1.47)

0.18

Q3

1.55 (1.22,1.97)

< 0.001***

1.59 (1.26,2.00)

< 0.001***

1.43 (1.13,1.81)

0.003**

Q4

1.90 (1.56,2.32)

< 0.0001***

2.07 (1.69,2.54)

< 0.0001***

1.76 (1.42,2.18)

< 0.0001***

P for trend

 

< 0.0001***

 

< 0.0001***

 

< 0.0001***

  1. Determined through multivariate logistic regression analysis.
  2. Model 1: Unadjusted.
  3. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, and race.
  4. Model 3: Further adjusted for education level, the poverty–income ratio, alcohol consumption status, smoking status, and weekly physical activity in total METs, building on Model 2.
  5. * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01, *** p value < 0.001